Search for: All records

Abstract This study introduces a hybrid model that utilizes a model-based optimization method to generate training data and an artificial neural network (ANN)-based learning method to offer real-time exoskeleton support in lifting activities. For the model-based optimization method, the torque of the knee exoskeleton and the optimal lifting motion are predicted utilizing a two-dimensional (2D) human–exoskeleton model. The control points for exoskeleton motor current profiles and human joint angle profiles from cubic B-spline interpolation represent the design variables. Minimizing the square of the normalized human joint torque is considered as the cost function. Subsequently, the lifting optimization problem is tackled using a sequential quadratic programming (SQP) algorithm in sparse nonlinear optimizer (SNOPT). For the learning-based approach, the learning-based control model is trained using the general regression neural network (GRNN). The anthropometric parameters of the human subjects and lifting boundary postures are used as input parameters, while the control points for exoskeleton torque are treated as output parameters. Once trained, the learning-based control model can provide exoskeleton assistive torque in real time for lifting tasks. Two test subjects’ joint angles and ground reaction forces (GRFs) comparisons are presented between the experimental and simulation results. Furthermore, the utilization of exoskeletons significantly reduces activations of the four knee extensor and flexor muscles compared to lifting without the exoskeletons for both subjects. Overall, the learning-based control method can generate assistive torque profiles in real time and faster than the model-based optimal control approach. 

In this study, we introduce a two-dimensional (2D) human skeletal model coupled with knee, spine, and shoulder exoskeletons. The primary purpose of this model is to predict the optimal lifting motion and provide torque support from the exoskeleton through the utilization of inverse dynamics optimization. The kinematics and dynamics of the human model are expressed using the Denavit–Hartenberg (DH) representation. The lifting optimization formulation integrates the electromechanical dynamics of the DC motors in the exoskeletons of the knee, spine, and shoulder. The design variables for this study include human joint angle profiles and exoskeleton motor current profiles. The optimization objective is to minimize the squared normalized human joint torques, subject to physical and task-specific lifting constraints. We solve this optimization problem using the gradient-based optimizer SNOPT. Our results include a comparison of predicted human joint angle profiles, joint torque profiles, and ground reaction force (GRF) profiles between lifting tasks with and without exoskeleton assistance. We also explore various combinations of exoskeletons for the knee, spine, and shoulder. By resolving the lifting optimization problems, we designed the optimal torques for the exoskeletons located at the knee, spine, and shoulder. It was found that the support from the exoskeletons substantially lowers the torque levels in human joints. Additionally, we conducted experiments only on the knee exoskeleton. Experimental data indicated that using the knee exoskeleton decreases the muscle activation peaks by 35.00%, 10.03%, 22.12%, 30.14%, 16.77%, and 25.71% for muscles of the erector spinae, latissimus dorsi, vastus medialis, vastus lateralis, rectus femoris, and biceps femoris, respectively. 

Abstract In this study, a 13 degrees of freedom (DOFs) three-dimensional (3D) human arm model and a 10 DOFs 3D robotic arm model are used to validate the grasping force for human-robot lifting motion prediction. The human arm and robotic arm are modeled in Denavit-Hartenberg (DH) representation. In addition, the 3D box is modeled as a floating-base rigid body with 6 global DOFs. The human-box and robot-box interactions are characterized as a collection of grasping forces. The joint torque squares of human arm and robot arm are minimized subjected to physics and task constraints. The design variables include (1) control points of cubic B-splines of joint angle profiles of the human arm, robotic arm, and box; and (2) the discretized grasping forces during lifting. Both numerical and experimental human-robot liftings were performed with a 2 kg box. The simulation reports the human arm’s joint angle profiles, joint torque profiles, and grasping force profiles. The comparisons of the joint angle profiles and grasping force profiles between experiment and simulation are presented. The simulated joint angle profiles have similar trends to the experimental data. It is concluded that human and robot share the load during lifting process, and the predicted human grasping force matches the measured experimental grasping force reasonably well. 

Abstract In this paper, an optimization-based dynamic modeling method is used for human-robot lifting motion prediction. The three-dimensional (3D) human arm model has 13 degrees of freedom (DOFs) and the 3D robotic arm (Sawyer robotic arm) has 10 DOFs. The human arm and robotic arm are built in Denavit-Hartenberg (DH) representation. In addition, the 3D box is modeled as a floating-base rigid body with 6 global DOFs. The interactions between human arm and box, and robot and box are modeled as a set of grasping forces which are treated as unknowns (design variables) in the optimization formulation. The inverse dynamic optimization is used to simulate the lifting motion where the summation of joint torque squares of human arm is minimized subjected to physical and task constraints. The design variables are control points of cubic B-splines of joint angle profiles of the human arm, robotic arm, and box, and the box grasping forces at each time point. A numerical example is simulated for huma-robot lifting with a 10 Kg box. The human and robotic arms’ joint angle, joint torque, and grasping force profiles are reported. These optimal outputs can be used as references to control the human-robot collaborative lifting task. 

In this study, a 3D asymmetric lifting motion is predicted by using a hybrid predictive model to prevent potential musculoskeletal lower back injuries for asymmetric lifting tasks. The hybrid model has two modules: a skeletal module and an OpenSim musculoskeletal module. The skeletal module consists of a dynamic joint strength based 40 degrees of freedom spatial skeletal model. The skeletal module can predict the lifting motion, ground reaction forces (GRFs), and center of pressure (COP) trajectory using an inverse dynamics-based motion optimization method. The musculoskeletal module consists of a 324-muscle-actuated full-body lumbar spine model. Based on the predicted kinematics, GRFs and COP data from the skeletal module, the musculoskeletal module estimates muscle activations using static optimization and joint reaction forces through the joint reaction analysis tool in OpenSim. The predicted asymmetric motion and GRFs are validated with experimental data. Muscle activation results between the simulated and experimental EMG are also compared to validate the model. Finally, the shear and compression spine loads are compared to NIOSH recommended limits. The differences between asymmetric and symmetric liftings are also compared. 

Lifting is a main task for manual material handling (MMH), and it is also associated with lower back pain. There are many studies in the literature on predicting lifting strategies, optimizing lifting motions, and reducing lower back injury risks. This survey focuses on optimization-based biomechanical lifting models for MMH. The models can be classified as two-dimensional and three-dimensional models, as well as skeletal and musculoskeletal models. The optimization formulations for lifting simulations with various cost functions and constraints are reviewed. The corresponding equations of motion and sensitivity analysis are briefly summarized. Different optimization algorithms are utilized to solve the lifting optimization problem, such as sequential quadratic programming, genetic algorithm, and particle swarm optimization. Finally, the applications of the optimization-based lifting models to digital human modeling which refers to modeling and simulation of humans in a virtual environment, back injury prevention, and ergonomic safety design are summarized.